Metalyse
Metalyse
Efficacy
Metalyse_photo_25mg

Metalyse® 25 mg (tenecteplase*) has non-inferior efficacy to Actilyse® (alteplase)†3

Efficiency
Compared_to_Metalyse

Compared to alteplase, the use of Metalyse® 25 mg is associated with reduction in the utilisation of healthcare resources5-7

Resources
Explore_the_metalyse

Explore the various Metalyse® 25 mg resources we have available for viewing or downloading

Metalyse Photo

Because Every Minute Matters

Consider Metalyse® 25 mg as your new standard of care for IV thrombolysis in all eligible patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

Footnotes

  • *
    Tenecteplase was administrated within 4.5 hours after onset of stroke symptoms, as a one-time decile-weight-tie bolus dose, based on 0.25 mg/kg for the maximum weight at each tier: < 60 kg, 15 mg tenecteplase; ≥ 60 to < 70 kg, 17.5 mg; ≥ 70 to < 80 kg, 20 mg; ≥ 80 to < 90 kg, 22.5 mg; and ≥ 90 kg, 25 mg.3
  • The AcT phase III trial was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, registry-linked, randomised trial, in which 1600 patients, presenting within 4.5 hrs of symptom onset, and eligible for thrombolysis, were enrolled from 22 stroke centres across Canada and randomly assigned to tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg, to a maximum of 25 mg; n=816) or alteplase (0.9 mg/kg to a maximum of 90 mg; n=784). The primary outcome occurred in 36.9% patients receiving tenecteplase and 34.8% patients receiving alteplase (unadjusted RD 2.1% [95% CI -2.6 to 6.9]).3
  • §
    In the AcT phase III clinical trial, the rates of AEs were similar for tenecteplase compared to alteplase. The main AEs were: death within 90 days (15.3% for tenecteplase vs. 15.4% for alteplase; RD -0.1 [95% CI -3.7, 3.5]), symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (3.4% vs. 3.2%; RD 0.2 [95% CI -1.5, 2.0]), extracranial bleeding (0.8% vs. 0.8%; RD 0.0 [(95% CI -0.9, 0.8]), and orolingual angio-oedema (1.1% vs. 1.2%; RD -0.1 [95% CI -1.1, 1.0]).3
  • IV= Intravenous

References

  1. Metalyse® European Summary of Product Characteristics.

  2. Donkor ES. Stroke Res Treat. 2018; 2018:3238165.

  3. Menon BK, et al. Lancet 2022; 400:161-169.

  4. Bivard A, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21:520-27.

  5. Warach SJ, et al. Stroke 2022; 53:3583-3593.

  6. Mahawish K, et al. Stroke 2021; 52:e590-e593.

  7. Warach SJ and Saver JL. JAMA Neurol. 2020; 77(10):1203-1204.